So, as it seems, S&M can go wrong for people in more than a simple Michael Hutchinsonsnosnonss choke-yourself-to-death-on-the-back-of-a-door kind of way.

Apparently a few people got into an active S&M based relationship with a particular dominatrix in New York, and some people couldn’t take the rivalry.

So, jokes about “getting pwned” aside, I was always under the impression that S&M relationships, that weren’t romantically based, were always more about dominance and effectively ‘owning’ the person who is supposedly the Sub (even though we know that in ap rofessional situation the Suub is actually the one in control of things). Furthermore, if you’re paying someone for that service, then surely you’re merely one client among many, and can’t actually expect “fidelity”… whatever that means in this particular instance.

If you are the Sub in this instance, the ‘owned’ party, you can’t really expect that your Dom is going to do things the way you want them to be done, except when it comes to hurting you in the way you like. So where precisely do you get off, if you excuse the pun, on shooting the Dom’s actual boyfriend, and then forcing your Dom intho the boot of the car? That really doesn’t sound terribly submissive to me, and this totally disregards the fact that you’re not exactly getting fidelity for a paid service… I mean, I don’t really expect my Cable repair guy to only make sure my cable’s ok, and he’s a pretty attractive guy!

Or maybe I’m just missing something here?

More to the point, what sort of car in New York doesn’t come equipped with one of these nowadays?

You might also like to read:

1. What the fuck is wrong with you people?!

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website